DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 24

1
Search between Chinese and Japanese text collections
In: http://www.mt-archive.info/NTCIR-2007-Gey.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
2
Search between Chinese and Japanese text collections
In: http://research.nii.ac.jp/ntcir/workshop/OnlineProceedings6/NTCIR/56.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
3
New directions in multilingual information access: Introduction to the workshop at SIGIR 2006
In: http://www.sigir.org/forum/2006D/2006d_sigirforum_gey.pdf (2006)
BASE
Show details
4
The query answering system Prodicos
In: Proceedings of Accessing Multilingual Information Repositories: 6th Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum, CLEF 2005, Revised Selected Papers, Vienna, Austria, September 2005 ; CLEF 2005 ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00444437 ; CLEF 2005, 2006, Austria. pp.527--534 (2006)
BASE
Show details
5
How Similar are Chinese and Japanese for Cross-Language Information Retrieval
In: http://www.mt-archive.info/NTCIR-2005-Gey.pdf (2005)
BASE
Show details
6
Geotemporal access to multilingual documents
In: http://ucdata.berkeley.edu/staff/gey/papers/geotemporal-access-ecdl-2004-poster.pdf (2004)
BASE
Show details
7
Berkeley at NTCIR-2: Chinese, Japanese, and English IR Experiments
In: http://metadata.sims.berkeley.edu/GrantSupported/./papers/ntcir2001.pdf (2001)
BASE
Show details
8
Research to Improve Cross-Language Retrieval { Position Paper for CLEF
In: http://metadata.sims.berkeley.edu/GrantSupported/./papers/clef-position-paper.ps (2001)
BASE
Show details
9
Automatic Construction of a Japanese-English Lexicon and its Application in Cross-Language Information Retrieval
In: http://www.clis.umd.edu/conferences/midas/papers/chen.ps (1999)
BASE
Show details
10
English-German Cross-Language Retrieval for the GIRT Collection - Exploiting a Multilingual Thesaurus
In: http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec8/papers/Berkeley-GIRT-trec8.pdf (1999)
BASE
Show details
11
English-German Cross-Language Retrieval for the GIRT Collection -- Exploiting a Multilingual Thesaurus
In: http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec8/./papers/Berkeley-GIRT-trec8.ps (1999)
BASE
Show details
12
Manual Queries and Machine Translation in Cross-language Retrieval and Interactive Retrieval with Cheshire II at TREC-7
In: http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec7/papers/berkeley.trec7.ps (1998)
BASE
Show details
13
Phrase Discovery for English and Cross-language Retrieval at TREC-6
In: http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec6/papers/brkly.ps (1998)
BASE
Show details
14
Berkeley at NTCIR-2: Chinese, Japanese, and English IR Experiments
In: http://research.nii.ac.jp/ntcir/workshop/OnlineProceedings2/ntcir2_berkeley.pdf
BASE
Show details
15
Prospects for Machine Translation of the Tamil Language
In: http://www.infitt.org/ti2002/papers/47FGEY.PDF
BASE
Show details
16
Working with Russian Queries for the GIRT, Bilingual and Multilingual CLEF Tasks
In: http://www.ercim.eu/publication/ws-proceedings/CLEF2/gey.pdf
BASE
Show details
17
Zacharek A, Jiang H
In: http://metadata.sims.berkeley.edu/papers/clef-main-paper.pdf
BASE
Show details
18
Research to improve Cross-Language Retrieval. Position Paper for CLEF
In: http://metadata.sims.berkeley.edu/papers/clef-position-paper.pdf
BASE
Show details
19
and
In: http://www.glue.umd.edu/~oard/papers/trec2002overview.pdf
BASE
Show details
20
and
In: http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~oard/pdf/trec2002overview.pdf
Abstract: Nine teams participated in the TREC-2002 cross-language information retrieval track, which focused on retrieving Arabic language documents based on 50 topics that were originally prepared in English. Arabic translations of the topic descriptions were also made available to facilitate monolingual Arabic runs. This was the second year in which a large Arabic document collection was available. Three new teams joined the evaluation, and the cross-language aspect of the evaluation received more attention this year than in TREC-2001. A set of standard linguistic resources was made available to facilitate cross-system comparisons, and their use as a contrastive condition was encouraged. Unique contributions to the relevance pools were more typical of previous TREC evaluations then the results of TREC-2001 had been for the same document collection, with no run uniquely contributing more than 6 % of the known relevant documents. 1
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.420.9591
http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~oard/pdf/trec2002overview.pdf
BASE
Hide details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
24
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern